The Audit Commission has completed a consultation on its proposed audit fees for health, local government and community safety organisations for 2011/12. Scale audit fees for these bodies will be between 5 and 20 per cent lower in 2011/12 than in 2010/11. You can get more details of the fees on our website.
And the Commission has agreed, subject to affordability, to give additional rebates in 2011/12. This means that public bodies audited by the Commission will see a significant net reduction in fees compared to 2010/11. They will be notified of the amount due to them in the summer.
Subject to the timetable for the Commission’s abolition, it is also committed to delivering further significant fee reductions of up to 15 per cent in 2012/13.
Chairman of the Audit Commission, Michael O’Higgins said: ‘We have listened to what respondents to our consultation have said and want to do more to help the bodies we audit. The Commission is continuing to drive down its costs and become more efficient. So it has been able to achieve almost £40 million in savings over three years, which are being passed straight back to health, local government and community safety organisations to help them with their own budgeting.’
Fees are the principal way the Audit Commission finances its activities, and it has a statutory duty to cover its costs, taking one year with another. During the consultation many respondents recognised that the Commission faces a difficult period leading up to its abolition. The proposals to give a rebate on 2010/11 fees, and reduce fees in 2011/12 were welcomed.
However, most local government respondents expressed the view that the previously proposed rebates and reductions were too small given the financial pressures councils will face next year. That is why the Commission has decided to increase the cost savings to audited bodies.
Others suggested that central government should pick up the costs arising from the ending of Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) and the abolition of the Commission, rather than public bodies.
Michael O’Higgins adds: ‘The costs of ending CAA, and of the Commission’s own abolition, must come from the public purse. Some will be met from reserves, and any balance will be funded by the Department for Communities and Local Government.
Because of the savings plans we already had in place and the timely and effective action we have taken to control our costs, we have been able to make rebates of £9 million to audited bodies in 2010/11, even after meeting the costs of ending CAA, including the cost of making several hundred staff redundant. We are committed to giving additional rebates in 2011/12 and further fee reductions in 2012/13.’